Professions and vocations: regulatory authority.
Summary
Existing law, the Business and Professions Code, provides for the licensure and regulation of various professions and vocations by boards, bureaus, and commissions within the Department of Consumer Affairs, including, but not limited to, the California Architects Board and the Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists. Under existing law, a city or county shall not prohibit a person or group of persons, authorized by one of these boards, bureaus, or commissions, as specified, to engage in a particular business from engaging in that business. This bill would provide that, beginning July 1, 2013, the California Architects Board and the Board for Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, and Geologists have the sole and exclusive authority to license and regulate the practice of professions and vocations regulated by those boards pursuant to provisions of that code, and that no licensing requirements, as specified, shall be imposed upon a person licensed to practice one of those professions or vocations other than under that code or by regulation promulgated by the applicable board through its authority granted under that code. The bill would prohibit a city, county, city and county, school district, other special district, a local or regional agency, joint powers agency, or state agency, department or other state office, except for those boards, from imposing a licensing requirement upon a person licensed to practice a profession or vocation regulated by one of these boards. The bill would state findings and declarations of the Legislature.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Jan 19, 2012
Vetoed Sep 25, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2012 · Assembly Aug 27, 2012
How they voted
21–5
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 31
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic20
50% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
2
Sep 25, 2012
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 25, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 29, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 29. Noes 1. Page 4962.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 28, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 27, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (52-6-12)
assembly
Jul 3, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
May 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-5-5)
senate
May 10, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 1. Page 3445.) (May 7).
upper
Feb 2, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and RLS.
upper
Jan 19, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Roderick Wright
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 975
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 975. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline