Political Reform Act of 1974: slate mailers.
Summary
The Political Reform Act of 1974 regulates mass mailings, known as slate mailers, that support or oppose multiple candidates or ballot measures for an election. The act requires that each slate mailer identify the slate mailer organization that is sending the slate mailer and make other specified disclosures, and further requires the slate mailer organization to file periodic statements reporting payments received and expenditures made to produce slate mailers. This bill would provide that, if a slate mailer organization sends a slate mailer or other mass mailing that displays a logo, insignia, emblem, or trademark that is identical or substantially similar to the logo, insignia, emblem, or trademark of a governmental agency or a nongovernmental organization that represents law enforcement, firefighting, emergency medical, or other public safety personnel, and that would reasonably be understood to imply the participation or endorsement of that governmental agency or nongovernmental organization, the slate mailer organization would be required to obtain the express written consent of the governmental agency or nongovernmental organization associated with the logo, insignia, emblem, or trademark prior to using the logo, insignia, emblem, or trademark in the slate mailer or other mass mailing. This bill would also provide that, if a slate mailer organization sends a slate mailer or other mass mailing that identifies itself or its source material as representing a nongovernmental organization with a name that would reasonably be understood to imply that the organization is composed of, or affiliated with, law enforcement, firefighting, emergency medical, or other public safety personnel, the slate mailer or mass mailing would be required to disclose the total number of members in the organization identified in the slate mailer or mass mailing. Existing law makes a knowing or willful violation of the Political Reform Act of 1974 a misdemeanor and subjects offenders to criminal penalties. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating additional crimes. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. The Political Reform Act of 1974, an initiative measure, provides that the Legislature may amend the act to further the act's purposes upon a 23 vote of each house and compliance with specified procedural requirements. This bill would declare that it furthers the purposes of the act.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Sep 30, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2011 · Assembly Aug 30, 2011
How they voted
23–6
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
May 31, 2011
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
54% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
11
Committee
14
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Senate adopted Conference Committee report. (Ayes 27. Noes 8. Page 5097.)
legislature
Aug 30, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Assembly adopted Conference Committee report. (Ayes 59. Noes 18. Page 6675.)
legislature
Aug 16, 2012
Legislature · Passed
From Conference Committee: Be adopted. (Ayes 4: Senators Lieu and Correa and Assembly Members Bonilla and Fong. Noes 1: Assembly Member Hagman. Page 4533.) (August 15.)
legislature
Aug 16, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Senators Correa, Gaines, and Lieu appointed to Conference Committee.
legislature
Aug 14, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Assembly Members Fong, Bonilla, and Hagman appointed to Conference Committee.
legislature
Aug 14, 2012
Legislature · Passed
Senators Correa, Dutton, and Lieu appointed to Conference Committee.
legislature
Sep 7, 2011
Committee
Senate refused to concur in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 26. Noes 8. Page 2368.)
legislature
Sep 1, 2011
Committee
Senate refused to concur in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 25. Noes 10. Page 2253.)
upper
Aug 30, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-11-2)
assembly
Aug 30, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (August 17).
lower
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
May 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-6-2)
senate
May 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 853.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 488
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 488. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline