SB 323 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act.

Summary
(1) Existing law, the Beverly-Killea Limited Liability Company Act, authorizes a limited liability company to engage in any lawful business activity, as specified, and governs the formation of limited liability companies, including requiring the members to enter into an operating agreement that shall be in writing or oral and to execute and file articles of organization with the Secretary of State. This bill would repeal that act as of January 1, 2014, and enact the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act, as of that date, which would recast provisions governing the formation and operation of limited liability companies. The bill would also authorize an operating agreement to be in a record or implied, in addition to being in writing or oral, and authorize a combination of those forms. (2) Existing law establishes requirements and procedures for membership interests in limited liability companies, including voting, meeting, and inspection rights. Existing law also specifies the duties and obligations of the managers of a limited liability company, including member-managers, as specified. The bill would distinguish between a manager-managed limited liability company and a member-managed limited liability company for purposes of defining the scope of a member's agency and imposing fiduciary duties only on persons in control of a limited liability company. The bill would authorize the establishment of classes of members. (3) Existing law provides that the Secretary of State may issue a certificate of status with respect to a limited liability company. This bill would also authorize the Secretary of State to issue a certificate of registration with respect to a foreign limited liability company. The bill would provide for the filing of specified records and would further provide that an individual who signs such a record affirms under penalty of perjury that the information in the record is accurate. (4) Existing law does not specifically provide for jurisdiction of courts in matters regarding a limited liability company. This bill would allow a limited liability company to be subject to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of courts in another state or the exclusive jurisdiction of California courts. The bill would also allow a member to consent to arbitration, as specified. (5) Existing law does not specifically provide for a member to dissociate from a limited liability company. This bill would specify when a member would be dissociated from a limited liability company and the effects of dissociation on the member. (6) Existing law establishes capital contribution standards and liability of members, and regulates the allocation of profits and losses, distributions of money and property, withdrawal of membership, assignment of interests, and dissolution of limited liability companies. Existing law requires the registration of foreign limited liability companies, as defined, with the Secretary of State, and prohibits the transaction of business in this state by an unregistered foreign limited liability company, subject to specified penalties. Existing law also regulates the merger of a limited liability company with one or more limited liability companies or other business entities, as specified, including requiring an agreement of merger and protection of the rights and liabilities of limited liability companies, creditors, and dissenting members. This bill would revise and recast those provisions. (7) The bill would provide that its provisions shall be operative on January 1, 2014. (8) Because this bill would expand the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 14, 2011 Signed Sep 21, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly Aug 31, 2012

How they voted

290
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Jan 26, 2012
D Democratic20
19 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican11
10 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
37
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Sep 21, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Aug 31, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 31. Noes 0. Page 5107.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 28).
lower
Aug 28, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
lower
Jul 3, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 26, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Jan 17, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jan 13, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2623.) (January 10).
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 14, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JV
Juan Vargas
DDemocratic
CA
40