Higher education: employees.
Summary
Existing law establishes the University of California, and provides for its administration by the Regents of the University of California. Existing law, known as the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, contains provisions relating to employer-employee relations between the State of California and the employees of state institutions of higher education, including the various campuses of the University of California and the California State University, as well as the Hastings College of the Law. These provisions assign major responsibilities for implementation to the Public Employment Relations Board. Under the act, an "employee" or "higher education employee" is defined as any employee of the Regents of the University of California, the Directors of the Hastings College of the Law, or the Trustees of the California State University. The act further provides that the board may find student employees whose employment is contingent on their status as students are employees only if the services they provide are unrelated to their educational objectives, or that those educational objectives are subordinate to the services they perform and that coverage under this chapter would further the purposes of the act. This bill would provide that student employees whose employment is contingent upon their status as students are employees or higher education employees for purposes of the act. In so doing, the bill would also delete the condition that students are employees or higher education employees only if the services they provide are unrelated to their educational objectives, or that those educational objectives are subordinate to the services they perform and that coverage under this chapter would further the purposes of the act.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Jan 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 10, 2011
Vetoed Sep 30, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly Aug 23, 2012
How they voted
20–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Jan 26, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Sep 30, 2012
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 30, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 23, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-26-2)
assembly
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 20, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Jan 26, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-9-2)
senate
Jan 19, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 2685.) (January 19).
upper
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Mar 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 416.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Feb 10, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Co
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Co
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Co
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Co
JV
Juan Vargas
DDemocratic
Co
JB
Julia Brownley
DDemocratic
Co
Leland Yee
DDemocratic
Co
MY
Mariko Yamada
DDemocratic
Co
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
SS
Sandré Swanson
DDemocratic
Co
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 259
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 259. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline