SB 1537 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Energy: rates: net energy metering.

Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined, while local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, are under the direction of their governing board. Existing law, relative to private energy producers, requires every electric utility, as defined, to develop a standard contract or tariff providing for net energy metering, as defined, and to make this contract or tariff available to eligible customer generators, as defined, upon request for generation by a renewable electrical generation facility, as defined. An electric utility, upon request, is required to make the contract or tariff for net energy metering available to eligible customer-generators on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer-generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. With one exception, existing law requires that each net energy metering contract or tariff be identical with respect to rate structure, all retail rate components, and any monthly charges, to the contract or tariff to which the same customer would be assigned if the customer did not use a renewable electrical generation facility, except that eligible customer-generators shall not be assessed standby charges on the electrical generating capacity or the kilowatthour production of a renewable electrical generation facility. This bill would prohibit the commission from adopting any new demand charge, standby charge, customer charge, minimum monthly charge, interconnection charge, or other fixed charge that applies only to customers receiving electric service pursuant to a net energy metering contract or tariff.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012 Vetoed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 29, 2012 · Assembly Aug 20, 2012

How they voted

255
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
May 29, 2012
D Democratic20
19 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican11
6 Yea 5 Nay
54% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
27
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Sep 27, 2012
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 27, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 20, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-22-5)
assembly
Aug 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 27, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (June 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 15, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
May 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-5-1)
senate
May 24, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3598.) (May 24).
upper
Apr 30, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1. Page 3304.) (April 24).
upper
Apr 12, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CK
Christine Kehoe
DDemocratic
CA
39