School facilities: design-build contracts.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2014, a school district governing board or community college district governing board to enter into a design-build contract for both the design and construction of a school facility or community college facility, respectively, if specified requirements are met. This bill would extend this design-build authority until January 1, 2020. (2) Existing law states the intent of the Legislature that design-build procurement by a school district or community college district not be construed to extend, limit, or change in any manner the legal responsibility of public agencies and contractors to comply with existing law. This bill would also state the intent of the Legislature that design-build procurement does not replace or eliminate competitive bidding. (3) Existing law requires design-build projects by a school district or community college district to progress in a specified manner, including, among other things, requiring the school district governing board or community college district governing board to prepare a request for proposal setting forth the scope of the project and authorizing the request for proposal to include, but not be limited to, specified information. This bill would require the request for proposal not to include a design-build-operate contract for educational facilities.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 7, 2012 · Assembly Aug 22, 2012
How they voted
26–3
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
May 7, 2012
D
Democratic20
75% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
9
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Sep 28, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4771.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 22, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Jul 3, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 27).
lower
Jun 14, 2012
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 17, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 7, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-3-2)
senate
May 1, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3388.) (April 30).
upper
Apr 17, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3120.) (April 11).
upper
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1509
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1509. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline