SB 1489 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Courts: management and destruction of trial court exhibits.

Summary
Existing law provides that, for purposes of specified provisions governing the management of trial court records, a "court record" consists of, among other things, administrative records filed in an action or proceeding, depositions, paper exhibits, transcripts, and recordings of electronically recorded proceedings, as specified. This bill would delete paper exhibits from the definition of "court record" for these purposes. Existing law authorizes the clerk of the court to distribute or dispose of exhibits that have been introduced or filed in any criminal action or proceeding after the final determination of the action or proceeding, as specified. In cases where the death penalty is imposed, existing law prohibits a court from ordering the destruction of an exhibit until 30 days after the date of execution of sentence. This bill would permit a court to order the destruction of exhibits, in cases where the death penalty is imposed, 30 days after the execution of sentence or, when the defendant dies while awaiting execution, one year after the date of the defendant's death.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012 Signed Sep 7, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly Aug 16, 2012

How they voted

282
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 23, 2012
D Democratic20
18 Yea 2 Nay
90% Yea
R Republican11
10 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Sep 7, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-2-1)
senate
Aug 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 2. Page 4761.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 16, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
Aug 16, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 19).
lower
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 15, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3313.) (April 24).
upper
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TH
Tom Harman
RRepublican
CA
35