Appropriation of water: Sewerage Commission Oroville.
Summary
Under existing law, the State Water Resources Control Board (board) administers a water rights program pursuant to which the board grants permits and licenses to appropriate water. Existing law requires the owner of a wastewater treatment plant to obtain the approval of the board prior to making any changes in the point of discharge, place of use, or purpose of use of treated wastewater, and requires the board to review the proposed changes in accordance with prescribed procedures. Existing law authorizes any municipality, governmental agency, or political subdivision operating a waste disposal plant that discharges water meeting the requirements of the appropriate regional board into the San Joaquin River to file an application for a permit to appropriate an equal amount of water, as adjusted for seepage and other factors, downstream from the disposal plant and out of the San Joaquin River or the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, which water may be sold or utilized for any beneficial purpose. Existing law authorizes the board to grant the permit to appropriate on such terms and conditions as in the board's judgment are necessary for the protection of the rights of others. This bill would authorize the Sewerage Commission Oroville to file an application for a permit, on or after July 1, 2013, to appropriate a specified amount of water that is based on the volume of treated wastewater that it discharges into the Feather River, as specified. The bill would authorize the board to grant a permit to appropriate that treated wastewater upon terms and conditions determined by the board. The bill would require the board, prior to granting a permit pursuant to these provisions, to comply with permit, approval, and review requirements and other laws applicable to the appropriation of water. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Sewerage Commission Oroville. The bill would require the board to prepare a report assessing the potential cumulative effects of the above-described discharge and appropriation provisions on the use of water rights by current water rights holders, the ability to meet or exceed instream flow standards in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers, and the ability to meet or exceed water quality standards in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and in the Sacramento and San Joaquin Rivers. The bill would require the board to post the report on its Internet Web site and transmit an electronic copy of the final report to subject matter committees of the Legislature by July 1, 2013, as specified.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Vetoed Sep 13, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2012 · Assembly Aug 16, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 21, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 13, 2012
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 13, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 21, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Aug 21, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4627.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 16, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
Aug 16, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 28, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 25, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
May 1, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3388.) (April 30).
upper
Mar 29, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3022.) (March 27).
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1340
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1340. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline