Vehicles: electronic wireless communications devices: prohibitions.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to examine applicants for specific driver's licenses and requires that the examination include, among other things, a test of the applicant's knowledge and understanding of the provisions of the Vehicle Code governing the operation of vehicles upon the highways. This bill would require the department to include a test of the applicant's understanding of the distractions and dangers of handheld cellular phone use and text messaging while operating a motor vehicle. (2) Existing law establishes that specified convictions and violations under the Vehicle Code and traffic-related incidents count as points against a driver's record for purposes of the suspension or revocation of the privilege to drive. Under existing law, it is an infraction for any person to drive a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone, unless that telephone is designed and configured to allow hands-free listening and talking operation, and is used in that manner while driving, except as otherwise provided. A person under 18 years of age is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone, even if equipped with a hands-free device, or while using a mobile service device. A point is not given for a violation of these provisions. This bill would assess a violation point on a 2nd or subsequent violation of these provisions. (3) Under existing law, a person is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication, except as specified. This bill would increase the base fines for a violation of any of the above-described prohibitions involving driving a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone or electronic wireless communications device from $20 to $30 and the fine for a 2nd or subsequent offense from $50 to $60. (4) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 12804.9 of the Vehicle Code proposed by AB 2188, to become operative only if AB 2188 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. (5) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 23123.5 of the Vehicle Code proposed by AB 1536, to become operative only if AB 1536 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Vetoed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2012 · Assembly Aug 23, 2012
How they voted
20–7
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 31
May 14, 2012
D
Democratic20
90% Yea
R
Republican11
54% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Sep 28, 2012
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 28, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 28, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 28. Noes 9. Page 4900.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 23, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-23-4)
assembly
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 12, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 25, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
May 14, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-7-4)
senate
May 1, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3388.) (April 30).
upper
Mar 28, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 3035.) (March 27).
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Feb 23, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joseph Simitian
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1310
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1310. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline