SB 1306 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

State Water Resources Control Board.

Summary
Under existing law, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the State Water Resources Control Board (state board) and the 9 California regional water quality control boards are the principal state agencies with responsibility for the coordination and control of water quality in the state. The act requires the state board to formulate and adopt state policies for water quality control, and requires the regional boards to adopt regional water quality control plans in compliance with the state policies. Existing law requires the California Environmental Protection Agency, or a board, department, or office within the agency, to enter into an agreement with the National Academy of Sciences, the University of California, the California State University, or any similar scientific institution of higher learning, or any combination of those entities, or with a scientist or group of scientists of comparable stature and qualifications that are recommended by the President of the University of California, to conduct an external scientific peer review of the scientific basis for any proposed rule, as defined, to include a policy adopted by the state board that has the effect of a regulation and that is adopted in order to implement or make effective a statute, and prescribes procedures for conducting that scientific peer review, as specified. This bill would add the adoption of general permit application requirements for stormwater discharges by the state board and would add a conditional waiver of waste discharge requirements from irrigated lands adopted by a regional water quality control board to the definition of rule for the purposes of the above provisions, and would require these provisions to apply only when fees are available to cover the state board's or a regional board's costs of complying with these provisions. This bill would also deem the state board or a regional board to have complied with the above provisions if a scientific peer review has been done on the scientific basis or scientific portion of an adopted rule.
Bill status died 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012 Last action Jun 19, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 25, 2012

How they voted

214
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 31
May 25, 2012
D Democratic20
11 Yea 4 Nay 5
55% Yea
R Republican11
10 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
17
Key actions
4
Committee
4
Amendments
2
Jun 19, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
lower
Jun 4, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
May 25, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-4-6)
senate
May 21, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3565.) (May 21).
upper
May 1, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 3262.) (April 23).
upper
Mar 29, 2012
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 23, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SB
Sam Blakeslee Ph.D.
RRepublican
CA
15