Healing Arts.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons by the Medical Board of California. Existing law requires the board to issue a license to an applicant who meets specified qualifications and requirements, including successfully completing a medical curriculum, as specified, in a medical school or schools located in the United States or Canada approved by the board, or in a medical school located outside the United States or Canada that otherwise meets specified requirements. Existing law requires the board to issue a license to an applicant who, among other things, (A) holds an unlimited license as a physician and surgeon in another state or states or a Canadian province or provinces, (B) has held an unrestricted license to practice medicine for at least 4 years, (C) has passed a written examination recognized by the board to be equivalent in context to that administered in California, (D) the board has determined has (i) not had disciplinary action taken against him or her, (ii) not been the subject of an adverse judgment or settlement, and (iii) has not committed any acts or crimes constituting grounds for denial of a certificate, in each case, as specified, (E) has completed specified postgraduate training, and (F) is board certified in a specialty, as specified. This bill would, upon review and recommendation, authorize the board to determine that an applicant for a physician and surgeon's certificate who acquired his or her medical education or a portion thereof at a foreign medical school that is not recognized or has been previously disapproved by the board is eligible for a certificate if the applicant (1) successfully completes a course of medical instruction leading to a degree of medical doctor, (2) holds an unlimited and unrestricted license in another state or federal territory and practiced for 10 or 20 years depending on whether the medical education was acquired from an unrecognized or previously disapproved foreign medical school, (3) is certified by a specified specialty board, (4) has successfully taken and passed specified examinations, (5) has not been the subject of specified disciplinary action or of adverse judgments or settlements, (6) has successfully completed 3 years of approved postgraduate training, (7) is not subject to denial of licensure under specified provisions, and (8) has not held a healing arts license and been subject to disciplinary action by specified healing arts boards. The bill would also authorize the board to adopt specified regulations concerning the acceptance of records when originals are not available and substitution of board certifications for years of practice or licensure when considering an application for a certificate pursuant to these provisions. (2) Existing law creates within the Department of Consumer Affairs the Board of Registered Nursing, and makes the board responsible for the licensure and regulation of registered nurses. Existing law requires the board to meet quarterly. This bill would require meetings of the board to be held in northern and southern California. (3) Existing law defines the term "approved school of nursing" and requires the board to approve and regulate registered nursing schools that are institutions of higher education or are affiliated with an institution of higher education, as specified. Existing law requires a school of nursing that is not affiliated with an institution of higher education to make an agreement with such an institution for purposes of awarding nursing degrees. This bill would delete the provisions requiring an agreement and would instead allow the board to approve a school of nursing that is affiliated with an institution of higher education, and that is subject to the requirements set forth in the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009 to grant nursing degrees. The bill would specify that the term "approved school of nursing" includes an approved nursing program. The bill would subject all approved schools of nursing to specified fees for deposit into the Board of Registered Nursing Fund, a continuously appropriated fund. Because the bill adds a new source of revenue to a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would require the board to have a memorandum of understanding with the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education to delineate the powers of the board and bureau, as specified. (4) Existing law provides that it is unlawful for anyone to conduct a school of nursing unless the school has been approved by the board. This bill would authorize the board to issue cease and desist orders to a school of nursing that is not approved by the board and would require the board to notify the Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education and the office of the Attorney General of such a school. The bill would also provide that it is unprofessional conduct for any registered nurse to violate that provision.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Jan 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Jan 24, 2011
Signed Sep 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly Aug 27, 2012
How they voted
24–4
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Jan 26, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
36% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
46
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
5
Sep 29, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 33. Noes 4. Page 5098.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 30, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 5042.)
upper
Aug 29, 2012
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 4923.) Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Aug 29, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 28, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 27, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-8-4)
assembly
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 26).
lower
Jun 20, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on B., P. & C.P. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 19).
lower
Apr 12, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and B., P. & C.P.
lower
Jan 26, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-4-3)
senate
Jan 19, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 2685.) (January 19).
upper
Jan 10, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 2622.) (January 9).
upper
Jan 5, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jan 4, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 2, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jan 24, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 122
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 122. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline