SB 121 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Pupils: foster children: special education.

Summary
Existing law requires a pupil who is placed in a licensed children's institution or foster family home to attend programs operated by the local educational agency unless the pupil is entitled to remain in his or her school of origin, the pupil has an individualized education program requiring placement elsewhere, or the pupil's parent or guardian, or other person holding the right to make educational decisions for the pupil, determines that it is in the best interests of the pupil to be placed in another educational program. This bill would require that, if the pupil's parent or guardian, or other person holding the right to make educational decisions for the pupil, makes that determination, he or she shall provide a written statement to that effect to the local educational agency, as specified. The bill would authorize a local educational agency to provide a parent, guardian, or other person holding the right to make educational decisions for the pupil with specified information, including, among other things, that the pupil has the right to attend a regular public school in the least restrictive environment. Existing law provides that no local educational agency shall refer an individual with exceptional needs residing in a licensed children's institution or foster family home to a nonpublic, nonsectarian school unless the services required by the individualized education program of the pupil can be assured, and that before a local educational agency places an individual with exceptional needs in, or refers such an individual to, a nonpublic, nonsectarian school, the school district, special education local plan area, or county office of education shall initiate and conduct a meeting to develop an individualized education program for the pupil. This bill would specify that these pupils shall not be referred to, or placed in, a nonpublic, nonsectarian school unless their individualized education programs specify that the placement is appropriate. The bill would also specify that the meeting that is required to take place to develop an individualized education program shall be conducted pursuant to specified provisions. To the extent this bill would require local educational agencies to perform additional duties, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law prohibits a licensed children's institution from requiring as a condition of residential placement that it provide the appropriate educational programs to individuals with exceptional needs residing there through a nonpublic, nonsectarian school or agency owned, operated by, or associated with, it. This bill would also prohibit a licensed children's institution from referring or placing a pupil in a nonpublic, nonsectarian school. This bill would prohibit a licensed children's institution from requiring that a child be identified as an individual with exceptional needs as a condition of admission or residency. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Jan 24, 2011 Signed Sep 26, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2011 · Assembly Aug 27, 2012

How they voted

218
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Jun 1, 2011
D Democratic20
19 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican11
2 Yea 8 Nay 1
72% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
39
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 26, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 4961.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 28, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 27, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Aug 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 8).
lower
Jun 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 13).
lower
May 3, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 13, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HUM. S. and ED.
lower
Jun 1, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-8-2)
senate
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 1112.) (May 26).
upper
Apr 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 639.) (April 13).
upper
Mar 24, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jan 24, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
CA
25