Public records: electronic format.
Summary
(1) The California Public Records Act requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection and, upon request of a person, to provide a copy of a public record unless the record is exempt from disclosure. The act requires an agency that has information that constitutes an identifiable public record not otherwise exempt from disclosure that is in an electronic format to make that information available in an electronic format when requested by a person. The act requires the agency to make the information available in an electronic format in which it holds the information. This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to these provisions. (2) Existing law requires certain state and local agencies to make specified data or documents available to the public by various methods, including on the Internet. This bill would require the State Chief Information Officer to conduct a study to determine the feasibility of providing electronic records in an open format, as specified, and to provide a copy of the study to the chairs of specified Senate and Assembly committees by January 1, 2014.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 6, 2012
Vetoed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2012 · Assembly Sep 1, 2012
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
May 31, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Sep 28, 2012
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 28, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 1, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-21-9)
assembly
Aug 31, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 3. Page 5116.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 27, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 21, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and L. GOV.
lower
May 31, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
May 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3589.) (May 24).
upper
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 3207.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 6, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Leland Yee
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1002
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1002. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline