State government: economic development.
Summary
The California Industrial Development Financing Act authorizes cities, counties, cities and counties, and redevelopment agencies to establish industrial development authorities that are authorized to issue industrial development bonds, the proceeds of which may be used to fund capital projects of private enterprise under terms and conditions specified in the act. That act establishes the California Industrial Development Financing Advisory Commission and grants it various powers relating to industrial development bonds. This bill, the California Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of 2011, would authorize the commission to establish the California Manufacturing Competitiveness Loan and Loan Guarantee Program for the purpose of attracting, retaining, and expanding manufacturing facilities, and would require the commission to establish guidelines for the implementation and oversight of the program. The bill would prohibit the commission from commencing the program until the commission adopts a resolution finding that there is sufficient expertise, either directly employed by the commission or employed under a contract with the commission, to assess the credit risk of applicants for assistance under the program and the aggregate credit risk retained by the commission for the loans, loan guarantees, and lines of credit in the commission's program. The bill would require the commission to provide for the development and administration of the program application and evaluation process, and would require that applicants to the program demonstrate that they meet specified requirements. The bill would also require each applicant to pay a nonrefundable application fee. The bill would also create the Manufacturing Program Account within the Industrial Development Fund. The bill would prohibit General Fund moneys from being deposited in the account. The bill would authorize a state agency to contract with the commission, as specified, to contribute prescribed funds for deposit into the account. The bill would prohibit the commission from commencing the program until the commission adopts a resolution finding that there is sufficient money in the account to cover the costs of implementing the program. The bill would allow moneys in the account to be allocated to a lending institution or financial company that will act as trustee of the funds, with the approval of the Department of Finance. The bill would further require the above-described application fees to be deposited in the account to ensure that funds are available to the state for the sole purpose of administration of the program. The bill would require the commission, beginning October 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, to post on its Internet Web site or provide to the Legislature, as specified, a report on the program's activities and impact on the manufacturing industry, and on the state's economy generally. The bill would provide that the above-described provisions shall be implemented only to the extent that sufficient moneys are available to the commission to implement the California Manufacturing Competitiveness Loan and Loan Guarantee Program. The bill would provide that its provisions only remain in effect until January 1, 2017, and as of that date are repealed.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Vetoed Oct 7, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly May 31, 2011
How they voted
25–1
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 31
Sep 7, 2011
D
Democratic20
80% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Oct 7, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3079.).
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-1-5)
senate
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 29, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 25).
upper
Jul 12, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. (Ayes 12. Noes 1.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on G.O. and GOV. & F.
upper
May 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 12).
lower
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on J., E.D. & E.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
VM
V. Manuel Pérez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 894
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 894. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline