Corporations: distributions.
Summary
Existing law provides for the formation and governance of corporations. Existing law allows a corporation to make a distribution of cash or property to shareholders, including a dividend or a repurchase or redemption of shares, only if either the corporation has retained earnings prior to the distribution equal to or exceeding the amount of the distribution or the corporation can satisfy specified balance sheet test and liquidity requirements after giving effect to the distribution, and the distribution will not render the corporation insolvent. This bill would allow a corporation to distribute cash or property to shareholders, including a dividend or repurchase or redemption of shares, if the amount of the corporation's retained earnings prior to the distribution equals or exceeds the sum of the distribution and the cumulative dividends in arrears on certain preferred stock and, after giving effect to the distribution, the value of the corporation's assets equals or exceeds the sum of its liabilities and the liquidation preference of any preferred stock, except as specified. The bill would provide that a board of directors may base a determination that the value of its assets exceeds the amount of liabilities on financial statements prepared on the basis of accounting practices and principles that are reasonable in the circumstances, a fair valuation, or any other method that is reasonable under the circumstances. Existing law provides that a shareholder who knowingly receives an improper distribution is liable to the corporation's creditors and holders of preferred shares, as specified, and that those parties may bring suit in the name of the corporation to enforce those liabilities. This bill would provide that holders of shares having preferential rights with respect to cumulative dividends in arrears shall not have the right to bring suit with respect to an improper distribution unless the amounts owed those holders, as specified, is greater than zero. The bill would also provide that a cause of action with respect to an obligation to return an improper distribution shall be extinguished unless brought within 4 years of the distribution date. Existing law requires a corporation to provide notice, as specified, to shareholders, with respect to a dividend other than one chargeable to retained earnings, stating that the dividend is being made from a source other than retained earnings, and stating the accounting treatment of the dividend. This bill would eliminate that requirement. The bill would make technical, conforming amendments.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 16, 2011
Signed Sep 1, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jul 14, 2011 · Assembly Aug 18, 2011
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Jul 14, 2011
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 1, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 18, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-7)
assembly
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 2441.).
lower
Jul 14, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Jul 14, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 19, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.I.
upper
May 3, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & F.
lower
Feb 17, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Co
AM
Allan Mansoor
RRepublican
Co
MG
Martin Garrick
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 571
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 571. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline