Vote by mail ballots and election result statements.
Summary
(1) Existing law makes the vote by mail ballot available to any registered voter. Existing law requires that those vote by mail ballots be received by the elections officials from whom they were obtained or by the precinct boards before the polls close on election day in order to be counted. Existing law authorizes certain local, special, or consolidated elections to be conducted wholly by mail, so long as specified conditions are satisfied. Existing law requires ballots cast in these vote by mail elections to be returned to the elections official from whom they were obtained no later than 8 p.m. on election day. This bill would, notwithstanding the above provisions, provide that any vote by mail ballot is timely cast if it is received by the voter's elections official no later than 3 days after election day, and either the ballot is postmarked on or before election day or, if the ballot has no postmark, a postmark with no date, or an illegible postmark, the vote by mail ballot identification envelope is signed and dated on or before election day. Because the bill would expand the duties of local elections officials, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires the elections official to prepare a certified statement of the results of the election and submit it to the governing body within 28 days of the election, except for specified elections. This bill would instead require the elections official to submit the certified statement of the results of the election to the governing body within 31 days of the election. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2011
Last action Sep 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2012 · Assembly May 23, 2011
How they voted
22–7
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 31, 2012
D
Democratic20
85% Yea
R
Republican11
54% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Sep 1, 2012
Committee
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. (Ayes 47. Noes 29. Page 6820.)
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-7-2)
senate
Aug 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 31).
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 23, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-5)
assembly
May 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 17, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
lower
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 562
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 562. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline