Local government: county assessors: property tax agents and property tax agent firms.
Summary
Existing law provides for the governance of counties. Existing law sets forth the powers and duties of the officers of a county and the board of supervisors. Existing law sets forth the qualifications of the county assessor, as specified. Existing constitutional provisions authorize the establishment of an assessment appeals board of a county. This bill would, in a county that regulates lobbying before the board of supervisors by ordinance, require the board to adopt an ordinance to regulate property tax agents and property tax agent firms. The bill would require the ordinance to include specific provisions, including, but not limited to, annual registration and a prohibition against property tax agents and property tax agent firms from making any political contributions to an elected county assessor or a candidate for county assessor within that county. The bill would authorize the board to impose a reasonably necessary fee to cover the costs to regulate the activities of property tax agents and property tax agent firms. By adding to the duties of a county, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would provide that its provisions do not apply to property owners, and are not to be construed to prohibit a tax agent from charging a contingency fee, as specified. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
failed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Last action Aug 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2012 · Assembly May 31, 2011
How they voted
27–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 31
Aug 30, 2012
D
Democratic20
85% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
42
Key actions
11
Committee
20
Amendments
2
Aug 30, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-0-4)
senate
Aug 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 13, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 14, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 22, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-3)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on G.O. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 28). Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 30, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 9, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 15, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 404
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 404. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline