Civil actions: interpreter costs: indigent.
Summary
Existing law provides that in a civil action, the prevailing party, as defined, is generally entitled to recover specified costs in an action or proceeding. These costs include court interpreter fees when the court has authorized a court interpreter for an indigent person represented by a legal services project serving indigent persons. Existing law also defines a pro bono attorney as an attorney, law firm, or legal corporation that undertakes representation of a party without charge to that party. This bill would provide that court interpreter fees may also be recovered when the court has authorized a court interpreter for an indigent person who is represented by pro bono attorney, as defined. Existing law provides for a program regulated by the State Bar that provides civil legal services to indigent persons, and requires a contract with the state for legal services that exceeds $50,000 to certify that the contracting law firm agrees to make a good faith effort to provide a specified minimum number of hours of pro bono legal services, as defined, during each year of the contract. Failure to make a good faith effort to provide those pro bono legal services may be cause for nonrenewal of the state contract for legal services. Under the bill, the certification of pro bono legal services for a legal services contract with the state exceeding $50,000 could be fulfilled by a certification to make either a good faith effort to provide the specified minimum number of hours of pro bono legal services or an equivalent amount of financial contributions to qualified legal services and support centers, as defined.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Mar 12, 2012
Signed Sep 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 30, 2012 · Assembly May 10, 2012
How they voted
28–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Aug 30, 2012
D
Democratic20
90% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Sep 29, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-3)
senate
Aug 29, 2012
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jul 5, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 10, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (51-13-6)
assembly
May 7, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (May 1).
lower
Mar 19, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee April 12.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2684
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2684. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline