Public works: wages: employer payment contributions.
Summary
Existing law requires that, except as specified, not less than the general prevailing rate of per diem wages, determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, as specified, be paid to workers employed on public works projects. Existing law deems per diem wages to include specified employer payments and provides that employer payments are a credit against the obligation to pay the general prevailing rate of per diem wages. Existing law, however, provides that credits for employer payments do not reduce the obligation to pay the hourly straight time or overtime wages found to be prevailing. This bill would provide that an increased employer payment contribution that results in a lower hourly straight time or overtime wage is not considered to be a violation of the applicable prevailing wage determination so long as specified conditions are met. This bill would provide that an increased employer payment contribution that results in a lower taxable wage is not a violation of the applicable prevailing wage determination if specified conditions are met.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Mar 5, 2012
Signed Sep 30, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 7, 2012
How they voted
42–24
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 70
May 7, 2012
D
Democratic44
93% Yea
R
Republican26
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 24. Page 6430.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
upper
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 13, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 17, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 7, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-24-4)
assembly
May 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 6, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee April 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SS
Sandré Swanson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2677
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2677. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline