Labor contractors.
Summary
Existing law requires an employer to furnish each employee with an accurate itemized statement showing, among other things, the name and address of the legal entity that is the employer. Existing law provides that a knowing and intentional violation of this provision is a misdemeanor. This bill would require an employer who is a farm labor contractor, as defined, to disclose in the itemized statement the name and address of the legal entity that secured the employer's services. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 226 of the Labor Code proposed by AB 469, that would become operative only if AB 469 and this bill are both enacted, both bills become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is enacted last. Because a willful violation of the bill's provisions would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 3, 2011
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2011 · Assembly May 23, 2011
How they voted
20–7
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 31
Aug 29, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
63% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 46. Noes 29. Page 2903.).
lower
Sep 1, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 29, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-7-4)
senate
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 29, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 23, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-26-5)
assembly
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (March 30).
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 6.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 243
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 243. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline