Vehicles: high-occupancy vehicle lanes.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation and local agencies, with respect to highways under their respective jurisdictions, to designate certain lanes for preferential or exclusive use by high-occupancy vehicles. This bill, until January 1, 2020, or until the Director of Transportation determines otherwise, as provided under the bill, and files that determination with the Secretary of State, would suspend, consistent with the state implementation plan for the San Francisco Bay area adopted pursuant to the federal Clean Air Act and other federal requirements, the hours of operation for highway lanes designated for high-occupancy vehicles, in the Interstate 80 corridor within the Metropolitan Transportation Commission's jurisdiction, in the morning reverse commute direction, as defined. Because the commission would be required to post signage of the above requirements along the Interstate 80 corridor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Interstate 80 corridor in the San Francisco Bay area. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Vetoed Sep 23, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 29, 2012
How they voted
44–16
Passed · 10 other
Total votes 70
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic44
70% Yea
R
Republican26
50% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Sep 23, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 23, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 29, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 43. Noes 24. Page 6584.).
lower
Aug 28, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 7, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 6).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (July 3).
upper
Jun 19, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 29, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-16-10)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
May 16, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 2, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2200
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2200. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline