Workplace smoking prohibition: long-term health care facilities.
Summary
Existing law prohibits an employer from knowingly or intentionally permitting, and a person from engaging in, the smoking of tobacco products in an enclosed space at a place of employment. Existing law provides that "place of employment" for purposes of that prohibition does not include, among other places, patient smoking areas in long-term health care facilities, as defined. Existing law provides that any violation of that prohibition is an infraction, punishable by a fine not to exceed $100 for a first violation, $200 for a 2nd violation within one year, and $500 for a 3rd and for each subsequent violation within one year. This bill would provide that a patient smoking area, as defined, is not a place of employment for purposes of the smoking prohibition described above only if the patient smoking area is not located in a patient's room, is located outdoors in a courtyard, patio, or other outdoor space that can be monitored by facility staff, and is located in an area that reasonably prevents smoke from entering the facility or patient rooms. By limiting the application of the exception for patient smoking areas, the bill would make some of those areas subject to the smoking prohibition, thereby creating an additional crime punishable as an infraction and imposing a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Jan 31, 2011
Vetoed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2012 · Assembly May 16, 2011
How they voted
23–6
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 20, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
54% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Sep 27, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 27, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 26. Page 6092.).
lower
Aug 20, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-6-2)
senate
Aug 20, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 28, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 27).
upper
Jun 6, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & I.R. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 6). Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 14, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and L. & I.R.
upper
May 16, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-24-4)
assembly
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (March 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 29, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 9, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 18, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 1, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WA
Wilmer Amina Carter
DDemocratic
Co
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Co
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 217
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 217. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline