Household goods carriers.
Summary
(1) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including transportation companies. Under existing law, the Household Goods Carriers Act, household goods carriers, as defined, are subject to the jurisdiction and control of the commission. The act prohibits a household goods carrier from engaging, or attempting to engage, in the business of the transportation of used household goods and personal effects, by motor vehicle over any public highway in the state, including advertising, soliciting, offering, or entering into an agreement, without a permit issued by the commission authorizing transportation entirely within the state, or a valid operating authority issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, for interstate transportation. The act declares that it is not to be construed as a regulation of interstate or foreign commerce, except as permitted under the United States Constitution and the acts of Congress. This bill would expand the definition of a household goods carrier to include a household goods carrier that engages in the permitted or unpermitted transportation for compensation or hire as a business by means of a motor vehicle or motor vehicles being used in the transportation of used household goods and personal effects over any public highway in this state. The bill would require a broker, as defined, to be considered a household goods carrier. The bill would additionally prohibit a household goods carrier from arranging, by any means or media, as a broker for the transportation of used household goods and personal effects. The bill would require the commission to establish rules permitting electronic transactions, as specified and would authorize specified documents to be in electronic form, if agreed upon by the carrier and the customer. The bill would require a household goods carrier to add a prominent link to the carrier's Internet Web site that directs consumers to an Internet Web site hosted by the commission that promotes consumer rights and protection. (2) Existing law requires telephone companies and related entities, as specified, upon demand and the order of a magistrate, to provide the commission, or an authorized official of the commission, access to the name and address of the subscriber to a telephone number being used by an unlicensed household goods carrier. Existing law prescribes the circumstances under which telephone corporations may release information regarding residential subscribers without their written consent. This bill would require telephone companies, as prescribed, to provide this access to the commission as specified above, without the written consent of the subscriber. (3) Under the act, every household goods carrier and every officer, director, agent, or employee of any household goods carrier who violates or who fails to comply with, or who procures, aids, or abets any violation by any household goods carrier of the act, or who fails to obey, observe, or comply with any order, decision, rule, regulation, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission, or of any operating permit issued to any household goods carrier, or who procures, aids, or abets any household goods carrier in its failure to obey, observe, or comply with any such order, decision, rule, regulation, direction, demand, requirement, or operating permit, is guilty of a misdemeanor, and if the violation is not willful, is punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by imprisonment in the county jail, as prescribed, or both. This bill would provide that the fine for this misdemeanor is instead not more than $2,500. The bill would also provide that a fine shall be not less than $1,000 for a violation involving operating or holding one's self as a household goods carrier without a permit. This bill also would provide that a household goods carrier that falsifies permit status, membership in an association, or location is liable for a civil penalty of not more than $2,500 per day of violation. Because a violation of the act or an order of the commission is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program by expanding the scope of a crime. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Sep 25, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly Aug 28, 2012
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 23, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
3
Sep 25, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 28, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6371.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Aug 7, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 6).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 25).
upper
Jun 19, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U. & C.
upper
May 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
May 2, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 12, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96(a).
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BB
Betsy Butler
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2118
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2118. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline