Public employees' retirement.
Summary
The Public Employees' Retirement Law establishes the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) for the purpose of providing pension benefits to specified public employees. PERS is funded by investment returns and employer and employee contributions. Existing law authorizes a contracting agency and its employees to agree in writing to share the costs of any optional benefit that is inapplicable to a contracting agency until the agency elects to be subject to the benefit. This bill would instead authorize a contracting agency and its employees to agree in writing to share the costs of the employer contribution with or without a change in benefits, as specified. The bill would prohibit an employer from using impasse procedures to impose member cost sharing on any contribution amount above that which is authorized by law. The County Employees Retirement Law of 1937 (CERL) authorizes counties and districts, as defined, to provide a system of retirement benefits to their employees. CERL defines compensation earnable for the purpose of calculating benefits as the average compensation for the period under consideration with respect to the average number of days ordinarily worked by persons in the same grade or class of positions during the period, and at the same rate of pay, as determined by the retirement board. This bill would exclude from the definition of compensation earnable any compensation determined by the board to have been paid to enhance a member's retirement benefit. The bill would also exclude various payments from the definition of compensation earnable, including payments for unused vacation, annual leave, personal leave, sick leave, and compensatory time off, as well as payments made at the termination of employment, except what may be earned and payable in each 12-month period during the final average salary period.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Jan 27, 2011
Signed Sep 12, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2012 · Assembly May 5, 2011
How they voted
31–0
Passed
Total votes 31
Aug 31, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Sep 12, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0)
senate
Aug 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 73. Noes 4. Page 6743.).
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jul 6, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (June 8).
upper
May 19, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 5, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-21-8)
assembly
Apr 14, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (April 13).
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Jan 28, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 27.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JB
Joan Buchanan
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 197
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 197. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline