Elections: casting ballots.
Summary
Existing law provides for the conduct of elections generally. Existing law prohibits the use of a voting system for an election unless it has been approved as meeting specified criteria by the Secretary of State prior to the election. Existing law defines a voting system as any mechanical, electromechanical, or electronic system and its software, or any combination of these used to cast or tabulate votes, or both. This bill would exempt from the definition of a "voting system" a ballot marking system. The bill would define a ballot marking system to mean a mechanical, electromechanical, or electronic system and its software that is used for the sole purpose of marking a ballot for a special absentee voter and that is not connected to a voting system at any time. The bill would require the Secretary of State to study and adopt regulations governing the use of ballot marking systems. The bill would establish procedures to govern the approval of ballot marking systems by the Secretary of State. The bill would prohibit the use of a ballot marking system at an election until it has been approved by the Secretary of State as meeting prescribed criteria. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 22, 2012
Signed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly May 29, 2012
How they voted
27–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 31
Aug 23, 2012
D
Democratic20
85% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
9
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6368.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-0-4)
senate
Aug 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 5, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
May 29, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-5)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
May 22, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 17, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 15, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 10).
lower
May 1, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 17, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 12 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JG
Jeff Gorell
RRepublican
Co
Cathleen Galgiani
DDemocratic
Co
CN
Chris Norby
RRepublican
Co
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Co
DL
Diane L Harkey
RRepublican
Co
JM
Jeff Miller
RRepublican
Co
JS
Jim Silva
RRepublican
Co
Katcho Achadjian
RRepublican
Co
KD
Kevin D Jeffries
RRepublican
Co
KO
Kristin Olsen
RRepublican
Co
LH
Linda Halderman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1929
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1929. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline