Employment: contractors: sufficient funds.
Summary
Existing law prohibits a person or entity from entering into a contract or agreement for labor or services with specified types of contractors if the person or entity knows or should know that the contract or agreement does not include funds sufficient to allow the contractor to comply with all applicable local, state, and federal laws or regulations governing the labor or services to be provided. This bill, in addition, would make these provisions applicable with regard to warehouse contractors. Existing law provides for a rebuttable presumption affecting the burden of proof that there has been no violation of this requirement of sufficient funding if specified conditions are met, including that the contract or agreement be in writing. The California Public Records Act requires state and local agencies to make public records available for inspection, subject to specified criteria, and with specified exceptions. This bill would require that upon the request of the Labor Commissioner, the person entering into the written agreement or contract to provide to the Labor Commissioner a copy of the provisions of the contract or agreement, and any other documentation, as provided. The bill would exempt any documents received by the Labor Commissioner pursuant to this requirement from the California Public Records Act.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 22, 2012
Signed Sep 30, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2012 · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
20–10
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 21, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 30, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 23. Page 6241.).
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 21, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-10-1)
senate
Jun 28, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 27).
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-21-4)
assembly
May 3, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 12, 2012
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on L. & E. Re-referred. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Apr 10, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1855
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1855. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline