AB 1811 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Charter schools: funding.

Summary
Existing law states the intent of the Legislature that each charter school be provided with operational funding that is equal to the total funding that would be available to a similar school district serving a similar pupil population, and requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to annually compute a general-purpose entitlement, funded from a combination of state aid and local funds for each charter school. Existing law requires revenue limit funding that is computed in the general-purpose entitlement to be based on the statewide average revenue limit funding per unit of average daily attendance received by elementary, unified, and high school districts, as specified. Existing law requires that the general-purpose entitlement for certain conversion charter schools to be determined, instead, based on the amount of the actual unrestricted revenues expended per unit of average daily attendance for that school in the year before its conversion to, and operation as, a charter school, adjusted as specified, and for subsequent fiscal years, based on the prior year allocation, adjusted as specified, including for any state general-purpose increases. This bill, commencing with the 2013–14 fiscal year, would require the general-purpose entitlement of a charter high school that is established on or after January 1, 2013, through the conversion of an existing public high school within a unified school district to be equal, for the first 3 years of operation, to the current year base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance of the sponsoring unified school district, adjusted as specified. Commencing with the 4th year of operation, the bill would require the charter school to generate general-purpose funding based on the statewide average revenue limit funding per unit of average daily attendance received by high school districts. These provisions would become inoperative either on July 1, 2018, and repealed on January 1, 2019, or on the effective date of a measure enacting comprehensive school finance reform, whichever occurs first.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 21, 2012 Vetoed Sep 26, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 10, 2012

How they voted

4123
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 70
May 10, 2012
D Democratic44
41 Yea 3
93% Yea
R Republican26
23 Nay 3
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
29
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Sep 26, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 26, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 6679.).
lower
Aug 29, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 14, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 28, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 20).
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 10, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-23-6)
assembly
May 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 11, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (March 28).
lower
Mar 6, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.