AB 1701 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Underground storage tanks: local agencies.

Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Secretary for Environmental Protection to implement a unified hazardous waste and hazardous materials management regulatory program. A city or local agency that meets specified requirements is authorized to apply to the secretary to implement the unified program, and every county is required to apply to the secretary to be certified to implement the unified program as a Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) . Existing law generally regulates the storage of hazardous substances in underground storage tanks and requires the provisions to be implemented by the local agency that is authorized to implement the unified program and thus be certified as the CUPA. Existing law also defines the term "unified program agency" as meaning the CUPA, or its participating agencies, that is approved by the secretary to implement or enforce those underground storage tank requirements. This bill would revise the term "local agency" for purposes of the underground storage tank requirements to mean the unified program agency with regard to the implementation of certain provisions regulating underground storage tanks and a city or county for purposes of provisions authorizing corrective action to releases from those tanks. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by imposing new duties upon local agencies with regard to the implementation of those requirements. (2) Existing law requires the State Water Resources Control Board to develop and implement a local oversight program for the abatement of, and oversight of the abatement of, unauthorized releases of hazardous substances from underground storage tanks by local agencies and authorizes the board to enter into an agreement with a local agency to conduct that program. This bill would revise those provisions to allow a city or county to apply to the board to be certified to implement the local oversight program and would provide, on and after July 1, 2013, that only a certified city or county is authorized to implement the local oversight program. The bill would authorize the board to certify a city or county that the board determines is qualified to oversee or perform the abatement and would require the board to adopt procedures and criteria for certifying and withdrawing certification from cities and counties, which procedures and criteria would be exempt from the requirements and procedures for the adoption of regulations. The bill would require the board, if it does not, by July 1, 2013, certify a city or county that has been previously implementing a local oversight program, to assign the cases from that city or county to the appropriate regional board or a certified city or county. The board would be required to review, at least once every 3 years, the ability of the certified city or county to carry out the local oversight program and would be authorized, after conducting the review, to withdraw the certification of the city or county, pursuant to a specified procedure. The bill would allow the board, on and after June 30, 2013, to enter into an agreement with a local agency to conduct the local oversight program only if the local agency is a certified city or county. (3) The bill would incorporate amendments to Section 25281 of the Health and Safety Code proposed by both this bill and AB 1566, which would become operative only if both bills are enacted and become effective and this bill is enacted after AB 1566. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 15, 2012 Signed Sep 25, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly Apr 23, 2012

How they voted

300
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 23, 2012
D Democratic20
20 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican11
10 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
33
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 25, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6365.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 2).
upper
May 8, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Apr 23, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-6)
assembly
Apr 18, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 18).
lower
Mar 28, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 20).
lower
Mar 12, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors