Workers' compensation.
Summary
Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law requires every employer to establish a utilization review process, either directly or through its insurer or an entity with which an employer contracts for these services, for the purpose of reviewing and approving, modifying, delaying, or denying treatment recommendations made by physicians with respect to injured workers. Existing law requires that the administrative director, in consultation with the Commission on Health and Safety and Workers' Compensation, prescribe rules and regulations for serving notices that contain specified information on employees. This bill would add information regarding objections to decisions based on utilization reviews to those prescribed notices. Under existing law, when a party to a proceeding institutes proceedings to terminate an award made by the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board for continuing medical treatment and is unsuccessful in these proceedings, the appeals board is authorized to award reasonable attorney's fees to an applicant resisting these proceedings. This bill would authorize the appeals board to award attorney's fees reasonably incurred by an applicant who prevails in a proceeding in connection with the enforcement of a final award of permanent disability following a medical dispute that arises in the course of the utilization review process.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 14, 2012
Vetoed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 17, 2012
How they voted
39–23
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 70
May 17, 2012
D
Democratic44
88% Yea
R
Republican26
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
6
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Sep 28, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 28, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 53. Noes 26. Page 6685.).
lower
Aug 29, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 27, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 15, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 13).
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. & I.R. and JUD.
upper
May 17, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-23-8)
assembly
May 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 9).
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 13, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 15, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1687
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1687. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline