Fort Ord Reuse Authority.
Summary
Existing law, the Fort Ord Reuse Authority Act, establishes the Fort Ord Reuse Authority to prepare, adopt, finance, and implement a plan for the use and development of the territory previously occupied by the Fort Ord military base in Monterey County. The act provides that the authority is governed by a board consisting of members from specified cities and authorizes the board to acquire and dispose of existing real property and facilities within the Fort Ord territory, to plan, finance, and construct new public capital facilities within that territory, to levy assessments, special taxes, or development fees, and to issue bonds. The act makes these provisions inoperative when the board determines that 80% of the territory of Fort Ord that is designated for development or reuse in the plan has been developed or reused in a manner consistent with the plan, or June 30, 2014, whichever occurs first, and repeals these provisions on January 1, 2015. This bill would instead make the act inoperative when the board makes the above specified determination, or June 30, 2020, whichever occurs first, and would repeal the act on January 1, 2021. This bill would also require the board to submit and approve a transition plan to the Monterey County Local Agency Formation Commission, as specified. The Fort Ord Reuse Authority Act also authorizes the board to, by ordinance, establish the Redevelopment Agency of Fort Ord and requires that a city or county receiving state subventions based on the military population residing at Fort Ord continue for a specified period. This bill would repeal the board's authorization to establish the Redevelopment Agency of Fort Ord and would repeal the provisions relating to the continuance of state subventions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Mar 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 8, 2012
Signed Sep 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2012 · Assembly Mar 29, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 20, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Sep 29, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 61. Noes 16. Page 6103.).
lower
Aug 20, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Aug 20, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 15, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 13).
upper
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Mar 29, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-13-8)
assembly
Mar 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (March 21).
lower
Mar 13, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 10.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Co
Anthony Cannella
RRepublican
Co
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Co
SB
Sam Blakeslee Ph.D.
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1614
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1614. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline