AB 1570 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act: record of proceedings.

Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes a procedure for the preparation and certification of the record of proceedings upon the filing of an action or proceeding challenging a lead agency's action on the grounds of noncompliance with CEQA. This bill would specify, until January 1, 2016, the types of projects for which an applicant can request the lead agency to, among other things, prepare a record of proceedings concurrently with the preparation of negative declarations, mitigated negative declarations, EIRs, or other environmental documents for specified projects. Because the bill would require a lead agency to prepare the record of proceedings, as provided, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) This bill would provide that the above provision would not become operative unless SB 984 of the 2011–12 Regular Session of the Legislature is enacted on or before January 1, 2013. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 1, 2012 Last action Aug 27, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 30, 2012

How they voted

690
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 70
May 30, 2012
D Democratic44
44 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican26
25 Yea 1
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
22
Key actions
6
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Aug 27, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 21, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 2).
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 30, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
May 16, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 17, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 11, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 9, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors