Public contracts: school districts: bidding requirements.
Summary
Under existing law, the governing board of a school district may require each prospective bidder for specified contracts to submit a standardized questionnaire and financial statement, including information relating to financial ability and experience in performing public works, which is required to be verified under oath. Existing law further requires a school district requiring the above information to adopt and apply a uniform system of rating bidders on the basis of the completed questionnaires and financial statements, as specified. This bill, for contracts awarded on and after January 1, 2014, and until January 1, 2019, would require the governing board of the district, except for school districts with an average daily attendance of less than 2,500, for certain public projects, to use procedures, which require a standardized questionnaire and financial statement to be verified under oath, for bidding applicable to public entities, as prescribed. This bill would require the questionnaire and uniform system of rating bidders to cover, at a minimum, the issues covered by the standardized questionnaire and model guidelines for rating bidders developed by the Department of Industrial Relations, as specified. This bill would provide that the questionnaire and uniform system of rating bidders would not preclude the governing board of the district from prequalifying or disqualifying a subcontractor. This bill would provide that bidders would include the general contractor and, if utilized, all electrical, mechanical, and plumbing subcontractors. This bill would authorize the board of the district to establish a process for prequalifying prospective bidders on a quarterly or annual basis, as provided. The bill would also require the Director of Industrial Relations, on or before January 1, 2018, to submit a report to the Legislature evaluating whether labor violations have decreased, as specified, and to recommend improvements to the system for prequalifying contractors and subcontractors on school district projects. By expanding the scope of an existing crime and by imposing new duties on local officials, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Jan 30, 2012
Signed Sep 30, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 28, 2012 · Assembly May 30, 2012
How they voted
21–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Aug 28, 2012
D
Democratic20
90% Yea
R
Republican11
63% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
10
Committee
10
Amendments
4
Sep 30, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 26. Page 6535.).
lower
Aug 28, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-7-3)
senate
Aug 28, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 5, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 27).
upper
Jun 18, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 30, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-21-4)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
May 2, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (April 18).
lower
Mar 27, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 9, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & C.P. and ED.
lower
Jan 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1565
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1565. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline