Vehicles: dealers: used vehicle sales: labeling requirements.
Summary
Existing law regulates the accuracy of information provided to consumers during vehicle sales, including the information contained in advertising, brochures, and manuals, as specified. Existing law also requires manufacturers, as specified, to disclose certain information regarding a vehicle's engine, as specified, by affixing a label on the vehicle. A violation of these provisions is an infraction. This bill would require a buy-here-pay-here dealer, as defined, to affix to and to prominently and conspicuously display a label on any used vehicle offered for retail sale that states the reasonable market value of the vehicle. The bill would require the label to contain specified information used to determine the vehicle's reasonable market value and the date the value was determined. The bill would require a buy-here-pay-here dealer to provide to a prospective buyer of the used vehicle a copy of any information obtained from a nationally recognized pricing guide that the buy-here-pay-here dealer used to determine the reasonable market value of the vehicle. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Jan 24, 2012
Signed Sep 29, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 29, 2012
How they voted
34–31
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 70
May 29, 2012
D
Democratic44
77% Yea
R
Republican26
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
9
Committee
15
Amendments
1
Sep 29, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 48. Noes 28. Page 6684.).
lower
Aug 29, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 5, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (July 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 13, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
May 29, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (34-31-5)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
May 22, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 24, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 10, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 15, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 9, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jan 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 24.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1534
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1534. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline