Fresno County jails: overcrowding: transfer to contiguous counties.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a superior court judge to designate the jail of a contiguous county for the confinement of a prisoner of his or her county when there is no jail in the county or when a county jail becomes unfit or unsafe for the confinement of prisoners. This bill would authorize a local law enforcement agency within the County of Fresno to transfer (1) prior to booking, a person who is under arrest and in the custody of that agency, or (2) upon a person's scheduled release from the Fresno County Jail due to overcrowding, he or she has been identified by the arresting agency as being at a high risk to reoffend, and he or she is the subject of a formal request from the arresting agency for notification prior to release. The bill would require, prior to any transfer, the governing bodies of the local law enforcement agency seeking the transfer and the receiving jail facility to enter into a written agreement governing the terms of the booking, housing, and transportation of transferees. The bill would provide that the County of Fresno, including its officers and employees, shall not be responsible for any costs, claims, or liability of any kind associated with or resulting from carrying out these provisions at the time of transfer, unless the Fresno County Sheriff's Office is the transferring agency and that all costs, claims, and liability would be the responsibility of the transferring. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Fresno.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 28, 2011
Last action Jun 26, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 19, 2011
How they voted
43–25
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 72
May 19, 2011
D
Democratic45
93% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Nay
R
Republican26
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
6
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Jun 26, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 3, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Aug 16, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 8).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 19, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-25-4)
assembly
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
Measure version as amended on April 7 corrected.
lower
Apr 12, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Apr 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on A.,E.,S.,T., & I.M. and L. & E.
lower
Mar 1, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
HP
Henry Perea
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1393
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1393. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline