Overtime wages: agricultural workers.
Summary
Existing law sets wage and hour requirements for employees and requires an employer to pay overtime wages as specified to an employee who works in excess of a workday or workweek, as defined, and imposes criminal penalties for the violation of these requirements. Existing law exempts agricultural employees from these requirements. This bill would remove the exemption for agricultural employees and would create a state-mandated local program by including agricultural employees as a class of employees protected by criminal penalties under existing law. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
died
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Aug 31, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2011
How they voted
43–25
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 70
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic44
97% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
6
Committee
16
Amendments
3
Aug 31, 2012
Committee
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. (Ayes 35. Noes 33. Page 6808.)
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Committee
Assembly refused to concur in Senate amendments. (Ayes 33. Noes 30. Page 6707.)
lower
Aug 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 28).
lower
Aug 21, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 20, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 28, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jan 30, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Aug 29, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25).
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-25-2)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 5, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1313
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1313. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline