Not-for-profit corporations.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the formation and operations of nonprofit corporations. Existing law provides for establishing a quorum of a board of directors to take action at a meeting and allows the articles of incorporation or bylaws to require the presence of specified directors in order to constitute a quorum. Existing law provides that the death of a director excuses requiring the presence of that director to establish a quorum. Existing law authorizes a board of directors to take action by unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting without the consent of an interested director, as defined. This bill would instead provide that death or nonexistence of a director excuses requiring the presence of a specified director to establish a quorum. The bill would also revise the definition of an "interested director," as specified. (2) Existing law excludes interested directors, as defined, from the directors required to consent in order to take action without a meeting. This bill would also, under specified circumstances, exclude common directors, as defined, from the directors required to consent in order to take action without a meeting. (3) Existing law provides that a director has only one vote on any action at a meeting and prohibits a director from voting by proxy at a meeting. This bill would apply those provisions to a unanimous written consent in lieu of a meeting. (4) Existing law requires all public benefit corporations to obtain a waiver from the Attorney General's office in order to file dissolution documents with the Secretary of State and requires those corporations to obtain the consent of the Attorney General to a proposed merger, except as specified. This bill would exempt from these requirements specified public benefit corporations that are not otherwise subject to the supervisory authority of the Attorney General. (5) Existing law requires certain charitable corporations and unincorporated associations holding property for charitable and certain other purposes to file specified reports with the Attorney General. Existing law requires a corporation to furnish an annual report to its members regarding transactions with interested persons. This bill would allow a corporation to furnish to its members a copy of a report filed with the Attorney General in lieu of the above annual report when the report to the Attorney General includes the information required in the annual report. (6) The bill would make other nonsubstantive and conforming changes. (7) This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 1113 of the Corporations Code proposed by SB 201, to be operative only if SB 201 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 3, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2011 · Assembly Sep 8, 2011
How they voted
31–0
Passed
Total votes 31
Sep 6, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Oct 3, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
Sep 7, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 3013.).
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 9 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0)
senate
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 30, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
May 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
May 3, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F. and JUD.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jim Silva
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1211
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1211. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline