AB 1200 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Elections: central committees.

Summary
Existing law requires that each member of a county central committee for the Democratic, Republican, and American Independent Parties take and subscribe to an oath or affirmation, as specified. Existing law provides that the oath or affirmation may be taken before any officer authorized to administer oaths. This bill would, instead, provide that the oath or affirmation may be taken before the chairperson of the county central committee, the immediate predecessor of the chairperson, or a designee of the chairperson or his or her immediate predecessor. Existing law entitles a member elected to central committees for the Democratic, Republican, American Independent, and Peace and Freedom Parties to receive a certificate of election. This bill would eliminate the above-described entitlement to receive a certificate of election and make other conforming changes. Existing law provides how members are elected to county central committees. The method by which members are elected varies from county to county depending upon certain factors, such as the number of Assembly districts that exist within the county. This bill would provide that, for the Democratic Party, in the County of Sacramento, the elected members of the county central committee shall be elected by supervisor districts with 6 members elected from each supervisor district, as specified. This bill would provide that, for the Democratic Party, in the County of Alameda, the elected members of the county central committee shall be elected by Assembly districts and that the committee shall contain at least a certain number of members from each district, as specified. This bill would provide that, for the Democratic and Republican Parties, in the City and County of San Francisco, the elected members of the county central committee shall be elected by Assembly districts, as specified. This bill would provide that, for the June 5, 2012, statewide primary election for the Democratic Party, in the County of Sacramento, and for the Democratic and Republican Parties, in the City and County of San Francisco, signers of nomination papers for candidates for county central committees shall be limited to voters who disclosed a preference for the respective parties and who are residents of the respective counties. Under existing law, for the Democratic Party, in each county containing less than 5 Assembly districts, the county central committee is required to reapportion itself at least every 10 years, prior to the June primary election of that year, as specified. This bill would eliminate the above-described reapportionment requirement. Existing law requires that each county central committee of the American Independent Party meet in the courthouse at its county seat, upon call, which shall be given by the elections official of the county and in quarters to be arranged or provided for by the elections official of the county, as specified. This bill would, instead, require the committee to meet at its county seat, upon call, which shall be given by the chairperson of the county central committee or the immediate predecessor of the chairperson. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Mar 2012
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Mar 2012
Signed into Law
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Signed Mar 8, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Mar 1, 2012 · Assembly Jun 2, 2011

How they voted

261
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 35
Mar 1, 2012
D Democratic23
17 Yea 1 Nay 5
73% Yea
R Republican12
9 Yea 3
75% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
36
Key actions
11
Committee
15
Amendments
3
Mar 8, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Mar 5, 2012
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 3920.).
lower
Mar 5, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 5).
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-1-8)
senate
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & R. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after March 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Feb 27, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (February 21).
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Feb 7, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 23, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-4)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 5, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 3, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors

Sponsors