AB 1133 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Grand jurors: conflict of interest.

Summary
Existing law provides that a person is competent to act as a grand juror only if he or she possesses specified qualifications. Existing law specifies the exemptions and excuses which relieve a person from liability to serve as a grand juror. The jury commissioner is required to inquire into the qualifications of prospective grand jurors and return a list of recommended grand jurors to the court. No challenge shall be made or allowed to the panel from which the grand jury is drawn, nor to an individual, except when made by the court for want of qualification, as prescribed. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding the above provisions, a grand juror who is a current employee of, or a former or retired employee last employed within the prior 3 years by, an agency within the investigative jurisdiction of the civil grand jury shall inform the foreperson and court of that fact and shall recuse himself or herself from participating in any grand jury civil investigation of that agency, including any discussion or vote concerning a civil investigation of that agency. The bill would provide that this provision shall be in addition to any local policies or rules regarding conflict of interest for grand jurors.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jul 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Aug 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Signed Aug 5, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jul 1, 2011 · Assembly Jul 5, 2011

How they voted

250
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 31
Jul 1, 2011
D Democratic20
16 Yea 4
80% Yea
R Republican11
9 Yea 2
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Aug 5, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 5, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-3)
assembly
Jul 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2187.).
lower
Jul 1, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-0-6)
senate
Jul 1, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 7).
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 12).
lower
Mar 22, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jim Silva
RRepublican
CA
67