Public social services.
Summary
Existing law provides for the award of attorney's fees and costs to, and the recovery of damages by, a plaintiff, when it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that a defendant is liable for physical abuse or neglect of an elder or dependent adult and the defendant has also been guilty of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice in the commission of the abuse. This bill would revise these provisions to change the standard of proof to a preponderance of the evidence. Existing law authorizes a plaintiff to recover damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant in addition to the actual damages. Existing law provides that an employer is not liable for punitive damages based on the acts of an employee unless certain conditions are satisfied. Existing law requires that these conditions regarding the imposition of punitive damages on an employer based upon the acts of an employee be satisfied before any damages or attorney's fees permitted due to liability for physical abuse or neglect of an elder or dependent adult are authorized to be imposed against an employer. This bill would instead require that these conditions regarding the imposition of punitive damages on an employer be satisfied before any punitive damages may be imposed against an employer found liable for physical abuse, as defined, or neglect, as defined. This bill would state that these provisions are not intended to affect the specified standard of proof for punitive damages.
Bill status
failed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Aug 31, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2011 · Assembly May 26, 2011
How they voted
31–0
Passed
Total votes 31
Sep 9, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Aug 27, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0)
senate
Jun 28, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 26, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-28-6)
assembly
Apr 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 12).
lower
Mar 14, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
RD
Roger Dickinson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1062
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1062. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline