Joint exercise of powers: reporting and disclosures.
Summary
Under the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985, a joint exercise of powers authority may issue or purchase bonds to assist local agencies in financing public capital improvements, working capital, liability, or other insurance needs, or projects whenever there are significant public benefits for taking that action. Under the Ralph M. Brown Act, all meetings of the legislative body of a local agency must, subject to designated exceptions, be open and public. That act requires the legislative body to hold regular meetings, and permits the legislative body to hold special and emergency meetings, requiring certain notices and agendas. This bill would require additional reporting and public disclosures by specified public entities that issue certain revenue bonds, including conduit revenue bonds, as defined. This bill would require entities formed under the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, and related officers, that fail or refuse to make required reports to forfeit specified amounts to the state, and would authorize, under certain conditions, the Attorney General to prosecute an action for these forfeitures. This bill would require that a resolution issued pursuant to the Marks-Roos Local Bond Pooling Act of 1985 relating to bonds, as specified, be adopted by the local agency during a regular meeting.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Jan 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2009 · Assembly Sep 8, 2009
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Sep 10, 2009
D
Democratic25
88% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-3)
senate
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2368.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Aug 19, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 4, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 254.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 99
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 99. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline