Public postsecondary education: student fee policy.
Summary
Existing law, known as the Donahoe Higher Education Act, provides for a public postsecondary education system in this state. This system consists of the University of California, the California State University, and the California Community Colleges. Existing law authorizes these institutions to require that mandatory systemwide fees, among other fees, be paid by students at these institutions. The provisions of the Donahoe Higher Education Act apply to the University of California only to the extent that the Regents of the University of California act by resolution to make them applicable. This bill would prohibit any increase in the mandatory systemwide fees charged to a resident undergraduate student enrolled in the University of California or the California State University adopted on or after July 1, 2011, from being effective before 3 months have elapsed after the date on which the fee increase is adopted. The bill would also require the regents and the Trustees of the California State University to develop methodologies for the adjustment of fees in accordance with a prescribed procedure. The bill, commencing with the 2011–12 academic year, would require the Legislative Analyst's Office to annually review, and report to the Legislature, its findings, conclusions, or recommendations regarding the implementation of policies implemented pursuant to the bill. This bill would provide that its provisions would not apply to the University of California, except to the extent that the regents adopt a resolution making them applicable. The bill would request the regents to adopt policies that are consistent with this bill. These provisions would become operative on July 1, 2011.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2010
Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2010
How they voted
23–6
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 34
Jun 2, 2010
D
Democratic23
78% Yea
R
Republican11
45% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Aug 16, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee August 12.)
lower
Aug 16, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 1, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 1, 2010
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2010
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 2, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-6-5)
senate
May 28, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3670.)
upper
Apr 28, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 27, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 3294.)
upper
Feb 5, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Co
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Co
GR
Gloria Romero
DDemocratic
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 969
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 969. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline