Pupil assessments.
Summary
Existing law, the Public School Performance Accountability Program, provides a state assessment program for schools, an intervention program for low-performing schools, and a reward system for high-achieving schools, as specified. This bill would require that any primary language assessment developed by the department and administered to limited-English-proficient students, as identified pursuant to existing law, on or after July 1, 2013, be included in the state's assessment system or any successor system and in the state's federal and state accountability system and any successor system. The bill would require the results of the primary language assessment to be used in any successor measure or results reported for the state's assessment systems and in any other successor measure, as specified. The bill would also require the results to be used in any measure, index, or results reported for the state's federal and state accountability system, or any successor system. These provisions would become operative on July 1, 2013. This bill would make various findings and declarations.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2010
Assembly Passage
Aug 2010
Vetoed
Sep 2010
Introduced Feb 2, 2010
Vetoed Sep 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2010 · Assembly Aug 23, 2010
How they voted
21–11
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 34
Jun 2, 2010
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
42
Key actions
11
Committee
7
Amendments
6
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Sep 30, 2010
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Aug 25, 2010
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 11. Page 4908.) To enrollment.
upper
Aug 23, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (35-22-3)
assembly
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee August 12.)
lower
Aug 13, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.)
lower
Aug 5, 2010
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Aug 2, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 6, 2010
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.)
lower
Jun 2, 2010
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-2)
senate
May 28, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 3669.)
upper
May 4, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 27, 2010
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 26, 2010
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 3182.)
upper
Apr 7, 2010
Upper · Passed
(April 7 amended version corrected April 14.)
upper
Mar 18, 2010
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 2, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 930
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 930. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline