Traffic congestion: motor vehicle registration fees.
Summary
Existing law provides for the imposition by certain districts and local agencies of fees on the registration of motor vehicles in certain areas of the state that are in addition to the basic vehicle registration fee collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles for specific limited purposes. The bill would authorize a countywide transportation planning agency, by a majority vote of the agency's board, to impose an annual fee of up to $10 on motor vehicles registered within the county for programs and projects for certain purposes. The bill would require voter approval of the measure. The bill would require the department, if requested, to collect the additional fee and distribute the net revenues to the agency, after deduction of specified costs, and would limit the agency's administrative costs to not more than 5% of the distributed fees. The bill would require that the fees collected may be used only to pay for programs and projects bearing a relationship or benefit to the owners of motor vehicles paying the fee and are consistent with a regional transportation plan, and would require the agency's board to make a specified finding of fact in that regard. The bill would require the governing board of the countywide transportation planning agency to adopt a specified expenditure plan.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2009
Committee Review
Senate Passage
Apr 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Jan 20, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Apr 16, 2009 · Assembly Sep 9, 2009
How they voted
22–13
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 38
Apr 16, 2009
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
3
Committee
0
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 17. Page 2389.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 9, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (39-28-2)
assembly
Apr 16, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-13-3)
senate
Jan 20, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 83
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 83. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline