Property taxation: local administration.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the creation of an assessor's office in each county, and requires the assessor's office to determine the new base year value for taxable real property that has been newly constructed. Existing law requires an assessee or his or her designee to file with the city, county, or city and county, a scale copy of the floor plans and exterior dimensions of the building designated for the county assessor at the time the assessee files, or causes to be filed, an approved set of building plans. This bill would authorize the county assessor to require the floor plans to be provided to the assessor in an electronic format, if available. (2) Existing property tax law authorizes each county board of supervisors to exempt from property taxation those properties having a full value too low to justify the costs of assessment and collection, and limits any exemption granted by each county board of supervisors to property with a value not exceeding $5,000. This bill would increase the limit for this exemption from $5,000 to $10,000. (3) The California Constitution authorizes the exemption from property taxation of the principal residence of a disabled veteran, or a veteran's spouse, in the case in which a person has, as a result of a service-connected disease or injury, become disabled or died while on active duty in military service. Existing property tax law requires the State Board of Equalization to prescribe all procedures and forms required to carry into effect any property tax exemption. This bill would authorize county assessors to supply specified information from disabled veterans' property tax exemption claims and county records at the written request of the board, in order to prevent duplications of the disabled veterans' property tax exemption within the state and improper overlapping with other benefits provided by law. (4) Existing law requires taxpayers that meet certain criteria to file a signed property statement with the county assessor. Existing law authorizes a taxpayer, in lieu of completing the property statement as printed by the assessor, to furnish the information required as attachments to the property statement, provided that one copy of the property statement is signed by the taxpayer and contains an appropriate reference to the data attached, or the property statement is filed electronically and authenticated, as specified. This bill would authorize a taxpayer to complete a property statement that is substantially similar to the property statement as printed by the assessor, as provided, in lieu of completing the property statement as printed by the assessor, and would authorize the assessor to consider the information provided by the taxpayer, in lieu of completing the property statement as printed by the assessor, as the property statement. (5) Existing law prohibits a county assessor from making a separate valuation of any parcel covered by a subdivision map filed for record after the lien date immediately preceding the current fiscal year. This bill would provide that this prohibition does not apply in any county in which the board of supervisors provides for a separate valuation pursuant to an ordinance adopted by a majority vote of the board.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Mar 10, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2009 · Assembly Sep 2, 2009
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Sep 9, 2009
D
Democratic25
96% Yea
R
Republican14
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
Sep 9, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2328.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-1)
assembly
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 15.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and APPR.
lower
Jun 23, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 15.)
lower
Jun 22, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.)
lower
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 639.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 10, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 822
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 822. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline