Works of improvement: progress payments: notice: retention proceeds.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires that, for private and public works of improvement, and in a public works contract, a prime contractor or subcontractor pay to any subcontractor, not later than 10 days after receipt of each progress payment, unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the respective amount allowed the contractor on account of the work performed by the subcontractors, to the extent of each contractor's interest therein, as prescribed. This bill would, instead, require that those amounts be paid not later than 7 days after receipt of each progress payment. (2) Existing law requires, with regard to a contract entered into on or after January 1, 1995, in order to enforce a claim upon any payment bond given in connection with a public work, that a claimant give the 20-day public works bond preliminary notice, as provided. Existing law further authorizes a claimant, if the 20-day public works preliminary bond notice was not given as prescribed by statute, to enforce a claim by giving written notice to the surety and the bond principal, as provided, within 15 days after recordation of a notice of completion, or if no notice of completion has been recorded, within 75 days after completion of the work of improvement. This bill would, instead, with regard to a contract entered into on or after January 1, 2010, require that the written notice to be given to the surety and the bond principal be given prior to the completion, as defined, of the project, or recordation of a notice of completion. (3) Existing law authorizes the Department of General Services, or any other department with authority to enter into contracts, to contract with suppliers for goods and services and for public works. Existing law provides that in a contract relating to the construction of a public work of improvement between the public entity and original contractor, the original contractor and a subcontractor, and in a contract between a subcontractor and any subcontractor thereunder, the percentage of retention proceeds withheld cannot exceed the percentage specified in the contract between the public entity and the original contractor. This bill would instead prohibit retention proceeds from exceeding 5% of the payment, as specified, for those contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2010, between a public entity, as defined, and an original contractor, between an original contractor and a subcontractor, and between all subcontractors thereunder. (4) Existing law contains various provisions relating to contracts for the performance of public works of improvement, including provisions for the payment of progress payments and the disbursing and withholding of retention proceeds. Existing law prohibits progress payments upon these contracts from being made in excess of 95% of the percentage of actual work completed plus a like percentage of the value of material delivered, as specified, and requires the Department of General Services to withhold not less than 5% of the contract price until final completion and acceptance of the project. This bill would, until December 31, 2013, instead, prohibit progress payments upon these contracts from being made in excess of 100% of the percentage of actual work completed, and would require the Department of General Services to withhold not more than 5% of the contract price until final completion and acceptance of the project.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 6, 2009 · Assembly Sep 9, 2009
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 38
May 6, 2009
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican14
85% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 2388.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 9, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-1-3)
assembly
Sep 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time and amended.
upper
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 7.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 6, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-4)
senate
Apr 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 656.)
upper
Apr 14, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 1. Page 478.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 802
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 802. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline