SB 726 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Health care districts: rural hospitals: employment of physicians and surgeons.

Summary
Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, restricts the employment of licensed physicians and surgeons and podiatrists by a corporation or other artificial legal entity, subject to specified exemptions. Existing law establishes, until January 1, 2011, a pilot project to allow qualified district hospitals to employ a physician and surgeon if certain conditions are satisfied. The pilot project authorizes the direct employment of a total of 20 physicians and surgeons by those hospitals, and specifies that each qualified district hospital may employ up to 2 physicians and surgeons, subject to certain requirements. The pilot project requires that the term of a contract with a licensee not exceed 4 years. Existing law requires the Medical Board of California to report to the Legislature not later than October 1, 2008, on the effectiveness of the pilot project. This bill would revise the pilot project to authorize the direct employment by qualified health care districts and qualified rural hospitals, as defined, of an unlimited number of physicians and surgeons under the pilot project, and would authorize such a district or hospital to employ up to 5 physicians and surgeons at a time if certain requirements are met. The bill would require that the term of a contract with a physician and surgeon not exceed 10 years and would extend the pilot project until January 1, 2018. The bill would require the board to provide a preliminary report to the Legislature not later than July 1, 2013, and a final report not later than July 1, 2016, evaluating the effectiveness of the pilot project, and would make conforming changes.
Bill status failed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2010
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Jun 2010
Governor
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Last action Nov 30, 2010
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2009 · Assembly Jun 28, 2010

How they voted

323
Passed
Total votes 35
Jun 1, 2009
D Democratic22
22 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican13
10 Yea 3 Nay
76% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
49
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Aug 20, 2010
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 4717.) Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jul 1, 2010
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Jun 28, 2010
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (32-18-11)
assembly
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Aug 31, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 9.)
lower
Jul 14, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 7.)
lower
Jul 7, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jun 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-3)
senate
May 27, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 1026.)
upper
May 6, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 5, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 730.)
upper
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 676.) Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors

Sponsors