SB 702 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Ancillary day care centers: employees: trustline providers.

Summary
Existing law, the California Child Day Care Facilities Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of child day care facilities by the State Department of Social Services. Under existing law, a violation of any of these provisions is punishable as a crime. Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to establish a trustline registry and, upon submission of the trustline application and fingerprints, to enter into the trustline registry the provider's name, identification card number, and an indicator that the provider has submitted an application and fingerprints, who would be known as a "trustline applicant." This bill would, commencing January 1, 2011, define an ancillary day care center, and provide that a person who provides care or supervision in an ancillary day care center is a provider for purposes of the trustline registry provisions. The bill would, commencing January 1, 2011, require a person who provides child care or child care supervision in an ancillary day care center to register pursuant to these trustline provisions. Existing law authorizes the department to charge a fee to trustline applicants, as specified. Under existing law, moneys collected by the department to implement the trustline provisions are continuously appropriated to the department without regard to fiscal year for expenditure to implement the trustline provisions. This bill, notwithstanding the existing fee requirements, would require the department to charge a fee to each trustline applicant who provides care in an ancillary day care center, that is equal to the total amount required by the department to process applications and maintain the trustline registry for these providers. By increasing the funds appropriated to the department for purposes of the trustline registry, and creating a new purpose for their expenditure, this bill would make an appropriation. This bill would provide that no General Fund moneys would be used for the bill's implementation.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Sep 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 21, 2009 · Assembly Sep 9, 2009

How they voted

284
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 38
May 21, 2009
D Democratic24
21 Yea 3
87% Yea
R Republican14
7 Yea 4 Nay 3
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
33
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 23. Noes 5. Page 2383.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 9, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (53-15-1)
assembly
Sep 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 27.)
lower
Sep 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 14. Noes 3.)
lower
Jul 15, 2009
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 30.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 21, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-4-6)
senate
May 19, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 5, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 4, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 700.)
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mark DeSaulnier
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
CA
7