Local fees.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Uniform Federal Lien Registration Act, governs the filing of notices of liens, certificates, and other notices affecting federal tax liens or other federal liens. The act requires a filing officer to issue, upon request, a certificate showing whether there is on file any notice of a federal lien or certificate or notice affecting any federal lien filed pursuant to the act or as specified. If the filing officer is a county recorder, the fee set by the filing officer may not exceed $15 for a certificate for each name searched. This bill would delete the limitation on the fee that may be charged by a county recorder acting as a filing officer for purposes of the act. (2) Existing law authorizes the county recorder of each county to charge a fee of $4 for the first page and $3 for each additional page for recording and indexing every instrument, paper, or notice required or permitted to be recorded, as specified. This bill would increase the maximum fee for the first page to $10, and would make other conforming changes. (3) Under existing law, every defendant, when represented by appointed counsel, is required to be assessed a registration fee not to exceed $25, but the fee is not required of any defendant that is financially unable to pay it. Under existing law, these provisions are operative in a county only upon the adoption of a resolution by the board of supervisors electing to establish the registration fee. This bill would increase the maximum amount for that registration fee to $50. (4) Existing law limits the fees that a court, county, or city, as applicable, may charge for various costs related to the judgment and execution of criminal matters, including certain administrative costs, costs related to collecting restitution or to probation supervision, certain costs of conducting a criminal investigation, and costs related to providing specified court services, such as a petition for changing a plea or for an order sealing a record. Existing law also limits the fee that a local agency may charge for taking fingerprints for licensing, employment, or certification to an amount not to exceed $10. This bill would increase the maximum fee for administrative costs of collection from 10% to 15%, and for other fees would delete those limits on the maximum fees that may be charged for providing those services pursuant to those provisions, as specified. This bill would also establish a fee to process installment payments, which would not exceed the administrative and clerical costs, and shall not exceed $75, as provided. Additionally, the bill would increase the maximum fee for changing a plea or setting aside a verdict from $120 to $150. (5) Existing law authorizes a county to levy charges for the reasonable costs of support of a minor against the father, mother, spouse, or other person, while the minor is placed, or detained in, or committed to, any institution or other place, or pursuant to an order of the juvenile court. Existing law limits the costs of support to actual costs incurred by the county for food and food preparation, clothing, personal supplies, and medical expenses, not to exceed a maximum cost of $15 per day, except that the cost may be adjusted every 3rd year to reflect the percentage change in the calendar year annual average of the California Consumer Price Index, as specified. This bill would increase that amount to $30 per day. (6) Existing law authorizes the county board of supervisors or the court, as the case may be, to require reimbursement for the actual cost of services rendered for a petition to seal or expunge a criminal record of a minor, not to exceed $120. This bill would raise that limit to $150.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Jul 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2009 · Assembly Sep 8, 2009
How they voted
22–14
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 38
Jun 1, 2009
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican14
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 21. Noes 16. Page 2370.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-27)
assembly
Jul 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 7.)
lower
Jul 13, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 1.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-14-2)
senate
May 11, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 1. Page 809.)
upper
Apr 23, 2009
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 588.) Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 676
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 676. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline