SB 656 California Senate · 2009-2010 Regular Session

Public employment: collective bargaining: peace officers.

Summary
Existing law establishes the Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) in state government as a means of resolving disputes and enforcing the statutory duties and rights of employers and employees under the Educational Employment Relations Act, the Higher Education Employer-Employee Relations Act, the Ralph C. Dills Act, and the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. Existing law includes within PERB's jurisdiction resolving disputes alleging violation of rules and regulations adopted by a public agency, as defined, concerning unit determinations, representations, recognition, and elections, as specified. Existing law requires bargaining unit determinations and representation elections to be determined and processed in accordance with rules adopted by a public agency, as specified. Existing law requires, in a representation election, a majority of the votes cast by the employees in the appropriate bargaining unit. Existing law requires PERB to enforce and apply rules adopted by a public agency concerning unit determinations, representation, recognition, and elections. Existing law also requires specified complaints to be processed as an unfair practice charge by PERB. Existing law does not apply the above provisions to persons who are peace officers, as defined. This bill would also exclude from those provisions a bargaining unit which is comprised of a majority of persons who are peace officers, as defined.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
May 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Vetoed
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009 Vetoed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2009 · Assembly Sep 2, 2009

How they voted

29–8
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 38
May 26, 2009
D Democratic24
23 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican14
6 Yea 8 Nay
57% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
In Senate. To unfinished business. (Veto)
upper
Oct 11, 2009
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
upper
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 33. Noes 7. Page 2296.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-3)
assembly
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on July 8.)
lower
Jul 8, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 25, 2009
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 26, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-8-1)
senate
May 12, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 848.)
upper
Apr 28, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 685.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2009
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mark DeSaulnier
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
CA
7