Electrical infrastructure: plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, as defined. Existing law requires the PUC, in cooperation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission (Energy Commission) , the State Air Resources Board (state board) , air quality management districts and air pollution control districts, electrical and gas corporations, and the motor vehicle industry, to evaluate and implement policies to promote the development of equipment and infrastructure needed to facilitate the use of electric power and natural gas to fuel low-emission vehicles. The PUC is required to ensure that the costs and expenses of any authorized programs are not passed through to electric or gas ratepayers unless the commission finds and determines that those programs are in the ratepayers' interest. Existing law requires the PUC to provide a progress report to the Legislature on its efforts to evaluate and implement the policies for the above-described purposes by January 30, 1993, and every 2 years thereafter. This bill would require the PUC, in consultation with the Energy Commission, the state board, electrical corporations, and the motor vehicle industry, to evaluate policies to develop infrastructure sufficient to overcome any barriers to the widespread deployment and use of plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles and, by July 1, 2011, to adopt rules that address specified matter. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill are within the act and require action by the commission to implement its requirements, a violation of these provisions would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2009
Committee Review
Aug 2009
Senate Passage
Jun 2009
Assembly Passage
Sep 2009
Signed into Law
Oct 2009
Introduced Feb 27, 2009
Signed Oct 11, 2009
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2009 · Assembly Sep 2, 2009
How they voted
29–1
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 38
Jun 1, 2009
D
Democratic24
87% Yea
R
Republican14
57% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Oct 11, 2009
Signed into law
Approved by Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2009
Introduced
Senate concurs in Assembly amendments. (Ayes 33. Noes 6. Page 2287.) To enrollment.
upper
Sep 2, 2009
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (50-15-4)
assembly
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on August 19.)
lower
Aug 20, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.)
lower
Jul 1, 2009
Committee
Read second time. Amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
(Heard in committee on June 29.)
lower
Jun 30, 2009
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.)
lower
Jun 1, 2009
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-1-8)
senate
May 21, 2009
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 948.)
upper
Apr 29, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1. Page 709.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 21, 2009
Committee
From committee: Do pass, but first be re-referred to Com. on T. & H. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 584.) Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Feb 27, 2009
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CK
Christine Kehoe
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 626
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 626. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline